Why Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, fibromylagia, cancer & more.

This blog is about the on-going challenge I'm having to finish the book about CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/UK) and several secondary diseases which can present as a result, i.e., fibromyalgia, depression, IBD, cancer (especially colon cancer), schizophrenia and Parkinson's, etc.
If you have followed the recent news that an American lab determined that the retrovirus, XMRV, was found in over 90% of people with CFS, although British and German labs have not been able to find this virus in CFS patients' blood, then you might assume that a cure is in sight. Vaccination is being talked about; the use of AZT (the same drug as HIV/AIDS patients take) is also being talked about, even though AZT can make a person who does not have AIDS very sick indeed. I tried to post my scepticism about the XMRV virus several times on the recent New York Times blog about the virus and CFS: I just mentioned that it is a well-known fact amongst CFS researchers that people with CFS are extremely prone to having antibodies to whatever virus is prevalent without actually ever coming down with a viral disease, and my comments got posted only once and were then quickly removed within a few days. So I doubt my that stating the non-viral cause is going to go down well either.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

UK Dept of Health recommends pushing people to exercise despite contraindications

Britain's Medical Research Council (Dept. of Health), ran a trial, PACE, reported on in The Lancet, UK medical journal in 2011) to evaluate - read, promote a psychological approach to treating ME (CFS in the USA).
The prime aim seemed to be steadily increasing exercise and telling the patient that it is all in his head. The 4 therapies used were: adaptive pacing therapy (APT), cognitive behavior (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), and specialized medical care (SMC). NB: APT does not mean that the patient decides how much to exercise, but standard amounts and times for exercise plus no naps.
Despite very limited improvement across all categories apart from APT, ie., between 3.4% decrease in fatigue, and 9.4% improvement in mean physical function compared not to a control group who received no treatment, but to the SMC group, and "severe adverse reactions" varying
between 1% to 3%, the government's decision was that the PACE trial was a success and was the way to go for CFS/ME patients.
Needless to say, the largest children's ME charity in Britain,The Young ME Sufferers Trust, disagrees, saying that a separate trial reported on in the Clinical Rheumatology journal in 2011, found that GET and CBT resulted in "worse physical function and bodily pain scores"; and
that "children's symptoms are exacerbated with GET".
The writer of the book, Osler's Web (the history of ME) commented that this was a way to avoid disability and medical payments as is seems to push the idea that CFS/ME is psychological in nature and that people can improve with more exercise than they would ordinarily consider.
And this despite, the year before, a group of 86 Member's of Parliament signing a petition to bring the issue of ME before Parliament, stating that ME is a genuine medical condition, that govt. funding "must be focused on the bio-medical factors involved and not simply managing the psychological symptoms". Now this concerted effort must have come about through ME patients and their families contacting their MP's and complaing about the way they were being treated - or not treated, sometimes (it is difficult to get diagnosed with ME).
So if anyone would like to make a comment on how they or their loved one was or is being treated by the medical community, please leave a comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any reasonable comments - even if diametrically opposed to mine - are welcome